Evidence calibrated to the individual question
The label “blood feud” is not treated as a conclusion. Analysis separates interpersonal violence, criminal retaliation, and asserted customary obligations, while examining contemporary practice and the specific reach of an alleged opposing family.
Country evidence informs the tribunal's assessment. It does not determine credibility or make the ultimate legal finding.
Analytical boundary
Questions commonly addressed
- Does the reported conduct correspond with current customary patterns?
- What indicators bear on reach, duration, and family involvement?
- Were mediation or reconciliation routes realistically available?
- How do policing and prosecution operate in the relevant locality?
01
Claim classification
Test the asserted feud against contemporary indicators rather than relying on broad descriptions of the Kanun.
02
Locality analysis
Map regional practice, family networks, municipal conditions, and credible evidence of continued interest.
03
Protection review
Evaluate reporting access, police response, prosecution outcomes, protective measures, and corruption evidence.
04
Relocation review
Assess traceability, social networks, documentation, livelihood, and durable safety in proposed locations such as Tirana.
Factors made explicit in the report.
- 01Contemporary Gjakmarrja indicators
- 02Family and community reach
- 03Police and judicial response
- 04Internal relocation durability